Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

ROBIN HOOD

IMO: 9087477
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Emden
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TT-Line GmbH & Co KG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

125

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,240

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+82%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

68.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−71%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,908 t

CO₂ emitted

31,421 t

Distance sailed

78,998 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,996 h

208 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 125 kg/nm · median 150 (−17%)

69.3Ranks 125 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 15.8 (−8%)

12.0Faster than 34% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,385 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+144%)

66.8Ranks 355 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 70.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−72%)

48.6Ranks 58 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,028 t

12.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ROBIN HOOD
Ro-pax median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ROBIN HOOD
Ro-pax median

14.515.015.516.016.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

ROBIN HOOD
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

ROBIN HOOD
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−2%	−6%	+1%	−9%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+2%	−1%	+13%	+22%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	+1%	+6%	−13%	+12%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−0%	−7%	−2%	−10%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−2%	+2%	+3%	−17%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+5%	+9%	−4%	+12%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−6%	−5%	+5%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	11,321	35,784	90,429	6,177	14.6	125	–	–
2024	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	11,423	35,951	89,137	5,849	15.2	128	–	–
2023	not published	9,908	31,421	78,998	4,996	15.8	125	–	–
2022	not published	11,259	35,477	90,333	6,047	14.9	125	–	–
2021	not published	11,547	36,385	92,463	5,748	16.1	125	–	–
2020	not published	11,465	36,128	89,986	5,809	15.5	127	–	–
2019	not published	11,366	35,813	93,408	6,262	14.9	122	–	–
2018	not published	11,479	36,171	88,584	6,030	14.7	130	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	1,385	567	+144%	355 of 408	70.9	253	−72%	Verifavia	C
2024	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	1,517	547	+178%	345 of 404	77.7	233	−67%	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	1,240	680	+82%	318 of 386	68.3	234	−71%	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	1,105	626	+77%	294 of 394	76.6	253	−70%	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	1,230	815	+51%	280 of 377	72.6	226	−68%	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	1,478	751	+97%	287 of 387	86.7	217	−60%	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	1,319	569	+132%	327 of 394	71.9	223	−68%	DNV	A
2018	not published	1,628	729	+123%	282 of 361	76.8	184	−58%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.