Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

FANTASTIC

IMO
9100267
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency
EIV 26.91 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grandi Navi Veloci Spa

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
189
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+19%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
864
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+18%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
64.7
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−65%)
Average speed
19.0 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+18%)
Fuel per day at sea
86.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
20,267 t
CO₂ emitted
63,192 t
Distance sailed
107,168 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,647 h
235 days, 64% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 193 kg/nm · median 150 (+28%)
69.3Ranks 322 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 17.4 kn · median 15.8 (+10%)
12.0Faster than 66% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 967 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+71%)
66.8Ranks 293 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 0.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−100%)
48.6Ranks 4 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports25%
  • From the EU36%
  • Into the EU34%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,564 t
5.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • FANTASTIC
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • FANTASTIC
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • FANTASTIC
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • FANTASTIC
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.3 kn+4%+2%−8%+36,816%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.8 kn−15%−19%+29%−100%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.3 kn+1%+3%−27%−3%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022−0.4 kn+9%+6%+16%−11%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.2 kn+7%+6%+77%−29%Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.7 kn−1%−4%−44%+70%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.5 kn−1%+2%−12%+17%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa18,09156,42393,7945,37617.4193––
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa19,07359,459102,4435,80317.7186––
2023not published17,30253,97979,2084,27618.5218––
2022not published23,29472,573108,2415,93618.2215––
2021not published18,43257,55092,9324,99218.6198––
2020not published9,73530,37752,4892,78518.8186––
2019not published17,61454,92794,4684,83219.5187––
2018not published20,26763,192107,1685,64719.0189––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa967567+71%293 of 4080.08253−100%RINAA+B
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa2.62547−100%20 of 4042.62233−99%RINAA+B
2023not published1,045680+54%281 of 38654.8234−77%RINAA+B
2022not published1,078626+72%288 of 39456.1253−78%RINAA+B
2021not published1,211815+49%272 of 37725.3226−89%RINAA+B
2020not published1,710751+128%310 of 38738.5217−82%RINAA+B
2019not published1,008569+77%289 of 39449.9223−78%RINAA+B
2018not published864729+18%202 of 36164.7184−65%RINAA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.