Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NORDKAPP

IMO: 9107772
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

71.7

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−54%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,492

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

487

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+116%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,681 t

CO₂ emitted

18,213 t

Distance sailed

79,291 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,186 h

258 days, 71% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.6 kg/nm · median 150 (−58%)

69.3Ranks 37 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 15.8 (−14%)

12.0Faster than 25% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 645 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+14%)

66.8Ranks 216 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 720 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+185%)

48.6Ranks 306 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,000 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDKAPP
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDKAPP
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDKAPP
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

NORDKAPP
Ro-pax median

5007501,0001,2501,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	−13%	−1%	+18%	−15%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−5%	−7%	−1%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+2%	−4%	+13%	−2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+5%	+7%	−11%	−47%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	+339%	+125%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+10%	+5%	−80%	+16%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−7%	−1%	+7%	−10%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,870	18,819	92,315	6,792	13.6	63.6	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,722	18,345	78,550	6,572	12.0	72.8	–	–
2023	not published	6,119	19,617	79,625	6,523	12.2	76.8	–	–
2022	not published	5,306	17,011	70,604	5,413	13.0	75.2	–	–
2021	not published	5,681	18,213	79,291	6,186	12.8	71.7	–	–
2020	not published	1,364	4,373	18,048	1,392	13.0	75.6	–	–
2019	not published	6,196	19,863	90,497	6,676	13.6	68.5	–	–
2018	not published	6,208	19,903	84,479	6,607	12.8	73.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	645	567	+14%	216 of 408	720	253	+185%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	756	547	+38%	251 of 404	951	233	+308%	DNV	C
2023	not published	776	680	+14%	221 of 386	982	234	+320%	DNV	C
2022	not published	793	626	+27%	223 of 394	642	253	+154%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,492	815	+83%	311 of 377	487	226	+116%	DNV	C
2020	not published	664	751	−12%	181 of 387	518	217	+138%	DNV	C
2019	not published	574	569	+1%	200 of 394	246	223	+11%	DNV	C
2018	not published	636	729	−13%	168 of 361	902	184	+390%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.