Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NORDNORGE

IMO: 9107784
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

64.2

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

576

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

257

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+16%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,476 t

CO₂ emitted

17,556 t

Distance sailed

85,267 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,642 h

277 days, 76% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.7 kg/nm · median 150 (−59%)

69.3Ranks 35 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)

12.0Faster than 19% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 686 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+21%)

66.8Ranks 227 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 893 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+253%)

48.6Ranks 333 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,982 t

11.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDNORGE
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDNORGE
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDNORGE
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

NORDNORGE
Ro-pax median

5007501,0001,2501,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−10%	−8%	+2%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−1%	+7%	+10%	+1%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+4%	−1%	+12%	+2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	+73%	−50%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−6%	−6%	+116%	+92%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+15%	+14%	−78%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	−4%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,449	17,469	88,297	6,677	13.2	61.7	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,932	19,017	86,446	6,707	12.9	68.6	–	–
2023	not published	5,473	17,547	78,706	6,625	11.9	69.5	–	–
2022	not published	4,709	15,097	70,310	5,612	12.5	67.0	–	–
2021	not published	2,819	9,038	40,626	3,202	12.7	69.4	–	–
2020	not published	1,387	4,448	18,776	1,478	12.7	73.9	–	–
2019	not published	5,476	17,556	85,267	6,642	12.8	64.2	–	–
2018	not published	5,908	18,942	88,360	6,723	13.1	66.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	686	567	+21%	227 of 408	893	253	+253%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	742	547	+36%	245 of 404	974	233	+318%	DNV	C
2023	not published	732	680	+8%	214 of 386	937	234	+300%	DNV	C
2022	not published	716	626	+14%	209 of 394	786	253	+211%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,441	815	+77%	303 of 377	823	226	+264%	DNV	C
2020	not published	751	751	+0%	195 of 387	612	217	+181%	DNV	C
2019	not published	576	569	+1%	202 of 394	257	223	+16%	DNV	C
2018	not published	593	729	−19%	162 of 361	814	184	+342%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.