Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

TANGER EXPRESS

IMO: 9112777
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Morocco
Port of registry: Tanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 37.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS Iberia S.L.U. · part of DFDS

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

109

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−31%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

338

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

396

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+82%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,065 t

CO₂ emitted

9,567 t

Distance sailed

28,181 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,290 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.7 kg/nm · median 150 (−43%)

69.3Ranks 73 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 15.8 (−27%)

12.0Faster than 8% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,262 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+123%)

66.8Ranks 339 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 170 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−33%)

48.6Ranks 156 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

818 t

8.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TANGER EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TANGER EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

TANGER EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

100200300400500600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

TANGER EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+15%	+14%	−0%	+185%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−16%	−18%	−0%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−0%	−3%	+2%	+91%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	+43%	+298%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−20%	−21%	+27%	−76%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+19%	+13%	−43%	−24%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	−9%	−32%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS Iberia S.L.U.	4,460	13,959	52,072	4,499	11.6	85.7	–	–
2024	DFDS Iberia S.L.U.	3,872	12,081	52,159	4,463	11.7	74.2	–	–
2023	not published	4,634	14,455	52,174	4,379	11.9	88.8	–	–
2022	not published	4,575	14,275	51,317	4,202	12.2	89.2	–	–
2021	not published	3,103	9,728	35,788	2,949	12.1	86.7	–	–
2020	not published	3,065	9,567	28,181	2,290	12.3	109	–	–
2019	not published	4,544	14,167	49,700	3,853	12.9	91.4	–	–
2018	not published	4,880	15,212	54,664	4,316	12.7	89.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS Iberia S.L.U.	1,262	567	+123%	339 of 408	170	253	−33%	DNV	B
2024	DFDS Iberia S.L.U.	443	547	−19%	183 of 404	382	233	+64%	DNV	B
2023	not published	608	680	−11%	177 of 386	415	234	+77%	DNV	B
2022	not published	319	626	−49%	128 of 394	433	253	+71%	DNV	B
2021	not published	80.2	815	−90%	50 of 377	546	226	+142%	DNV	B
2020	not published	338	751	−55%	122 of 387	396	217	+82%	DNV	B
2019	not published	442	569	−22%	165 of 394	420	223	+88%	DNV	B
2018	not published	648	729	−11%	172 of 361	349	184	+89%	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.