Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LAURA

IMO: 9126223
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Pikis
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Langh Ship Oy Ab

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

57.5

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

34.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+67%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,955 t

CO₂ emitted

12,349 t

Distance sailed

68,780 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,321 h

222 days, 61% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 59.7 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+70%)

17.4Ranks 2,053 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 9.3 (+38%)

6.9Faster than 95% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 41.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+64%)

10.2Ranks 2,279 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

784 t

6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LAURA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LAURA
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LAURA
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.3 kn	+3%	+14%	−23%	+14%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+1%	−10%	−5%	+7%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−1%	−4%	−3%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−0%	+4%	+1%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	+3%	−6%	−7%	+4%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−1%	+9%	+7%	+1%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−3%	−10%	−7%	−4%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	3,012	9,411	50,445	3,946	12.8	59.7	–	100%
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	3,781	11,807	65,094	5,651	11.5	58.1	38.8	–
2023	not published	3,955	12,349	68,780	5,321	12.9	57.5	–	–
2022	not published	4,140	12,925	71,019	5,368	13.2	58.3	–	–
2021	not published	4,131	12,903	70,637	5,568	12.7	58.5	–	–
2020	not published	4,299	13,413	75,717	5,458	13.9	56.8	–	–
2019	not published	4,027	12,565	70,525	5,546	12.7	57.1	–	–
2018	not published	4,484	13,989	76,243	5,546	13.7	58.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	41.9	25.5	+64%	2,279 of 2,723	RINA	A
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	36.8	19.3	+91%	981 of 1,111	RINA	A
2023	not published	34.5	20.7	+67%	900 of 1,045	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	39.6	21.6	+84%	891 of 1,034	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	39.3	22.7	+73%	1,007 of 1,142	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	37.8	24.5	+54%	949 of 1,167	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	37.5	25.0	+50%	898 of 1,154	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	39.0	24.9	+57%	820 of 1,044	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.