Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

HJORDIS

IMO: 9126235
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Pikis
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Langh Ship Oy Ab

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

54.6

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

29.8

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+44%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,866 t

CO₂ emitted

12,068 t

Distance sailed

70,841 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,388 h

225 days, 62% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 54.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+54%)

17.4Ranks 1,955 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 9.3 (+41%)

6.9Faster than 96% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 35.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+37%)

10.2Ranks 2,034 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

276 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HJORDIS
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HJORDIS
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

HJORDIS
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−2%	+6%	+7%	+2%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+1%	−6%	−10%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−5%	−7%	−4%	−24%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−2%	+2%	+5%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+2%	−4%	−8%	+6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	+5%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−1%	+1%	−0%	−6%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	3,683	11,500	67,954	5,206	13.1	54.2	–	100%
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	3,506	10,948	63,563	5,236	12.1	55.2	37.2	–
2023	not published	3,866	12,068	70,841	5,388	13.1	54.6	–	–
2022	not published	4,220	13,166	73,482	5,473	13.4	57.4	–	–
2021	not published	4,127	12,882	70,158	5,443	12.9	58.8	–	–
2020	not published	4,434	13,833	76,609	5,633	13.6	57.9	–	–
2019	not published	4,356	13,596	73,299	5,437	13.5	59.4	–	–
2018	not published	4,407	13,755	73,370	5,539	13.2	60.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	35.0	25.5	+37%	2,034 of 2,723	RINA	A
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	34.3	19.3	+78%	965 of 1,111	RINA	A
2023	not published	29.8	20.7	+44%	820 of 1,045	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	39.0	21.6	+81%	885 of 1,034	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	41.2	22.7	+82%	1,023 of 1,142	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	38.8	24.5	+58%	959 of 1,167	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	39.8	25.0	+59%	928 of 1,154	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	42.5	24.9	+71%	850 of 1,044	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.