Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MSC BRIDGE

IMO: 9138783
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 6,243 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,243 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

120.5 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

60.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−37%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−36%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,113 t

CO₂ emitted

12,848 t

13,050 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

34,143 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,723 h

155 days, 43% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 120.5 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+15%)

56.6Ranks 159 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 14.4 (−36%)

10.9Faster than 4% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 60.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−37%)

47.35Ranks 47 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU44%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU13%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,319 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC BRIDGE
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC BRIDGE
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC BRIDGE
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−4%	+3%	+2%	−15%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+10%	+14%	+18%	−15%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−4%	−6%	−17%	+22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−4%	−11%	−0%	−10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−3%	−6%	+2%	−0%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−16%	−18%	−1%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−12%	−15%	+91%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	4,113	12,848	34,143	3,723	9.2	120.5	60.28	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,190	13,110	33,483	3,907	8.6	125.1	70.78	–
2023	not published	3,219	10,182	28,276	3,430	8.2	113.8	83.43	–
2022	not published	4,008	12,677	33,977	4,022	8.4	118.0	68.38	–
2021	not published	4,158	13,149	34,004	3,718	9.1	122.3	76.05	–
2020	not published	4,219	13,338	33,327	3,541	9.4	126.6	76.23	–
2019	not published	5,071	15,872	33,552	3,476	9.7	151.1	84.16	–
2018	not published	3,029	9,484	17,563	1,767	9.9	172.4	94.03	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	60.28	95.19	−37%	47 of 235	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	70.78	97.53	−27%	51 of 220	DNV	C
2023	not published	83.43	108.62	−23%	78 of 221	DNV	C
2022	not published	68.38	90.62	−25%	62 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	76.05	103.64	−27%	71 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	76.23	102.77	−26%	72 of 238	DNV	C
2019	not published	84.16	90.89	−7%	116 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	94.03	91.03	+3%	142 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.