Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

EXCELLENT

IMO
9143441
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency
EIV 23.81 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grandi Navi Veloci Spa

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
192
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+24%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
750
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+32%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
124
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (−44%)
Average speed
19.0 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+20%)
Fuel per day at sea
87.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
21,007 t
CO₂ emitted
65,455 t
Distance sailed
109,366 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,758 h
240 days, 66% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 222 kg/nm · median 150 (+48%)
69.3Ranks 356 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 18.7 kn · median 15.8 (+18%)
12.0Faster than 75% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,134 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+100%)
66.8Ranks 324 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 0.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−100%)
48.6Ranks 16 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports37%
  • From the EU31%
  • Into the EU29%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,970 t
3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • EXCELLENT
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • EXCELLENT
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EXCELLENT
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • EXCELLENT
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.4 kn+2%−1%−27%+23,713%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.1 kn+2%+2%+6%−100%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023+0.1 kn−4%−4%+4%−8%Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.9 kn−3%−7%+45%−21%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.4 kn+12%+15%−8%+17%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.4 kn+7%+9%−24%+50%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.0 kn−5%−5%+14%+2%Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa19,84261,94789,5284,79718.7222––
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa26,87183,731123,1366,45619.1218––
2023not published24,92677,687116,0396,11419.0215––
2022not published24,93577,684111,4205,90218.9224––
2021not published17,71755,32677,0773,89919.8230––
2020not published17,11853,40683,6344,31619.4205––
2019not published21,00765,455109,3665,75819.0192––
2018not published19,53860,89096,3505,07019.0203––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa1,134567+100%324 of 4080.17253−100%RINAA
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa4.76547−99%22 of 4044.76233−98%RINAA
2023not published958680+41%256 of 38687.4234−63%RINAA
2022not published1,044626+67%276 of 39499.0253−61%RINAA+B
2021not published1,320815+62%287 of 37743.3226−81%RINAA+B
2020not published1,126751+50%239 of 38762.2217−71%RINAA+B
2019not published750569+32%232 of 394124223−44%RINAA+B
2018not published739729+1%183 of 361148184−20%RINAA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.