Navalyze · Container · Ship

KOBE EXPRESS

IMO: 9143544
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 35,250 t
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.06 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 36,061 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

180

Container median 182 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−23%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,759 t

CO₂ emitted

21,109 t

Distance sailed

37,621 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,643 h

110 days, 30% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 180 kg/nm · median 177 (+2%)

78.8Ranks 1,124 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 58% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−2%)

7.22Ranks 1,091 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU39%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

6,759 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

903 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KOBE EXPRESS
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KOBE EXPRESS
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KOBE EXPRESS
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+14%	+9%	−44%	+13%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+2%	−2%	+60%	−10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−22%	−26%	−30%	−13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.7 kn	+7%	+20%	+152%	+14%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	+12%	+27%	−15%	+17%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−5%	−1%	+35%	−7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−2%	−18%	−30%	−7%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	8,541	26,848	47,484	3,431	13.8	180	16.0	98%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	13,367	41,814	84,561	5,866	14.4	158	14.2	97%
2023	not published	8,212	25,856	52,986	3,523	15.0	155	15.8	95%
2022	not published	15,084	47,600	75,735	4,773	15.9	199	18.1	97%
2021	not published	5,590	17,646	30,049	2,123	14.2	186	15.9	96%
2020	not published	5,902	18,636	35,459	2,840	12.5	166	13.5	100%
2019	not published	4,614	14,423	26,317	2,193	12.0	175	14.5	100%
2018	not published	6,759	21,109	37,621	2,643	14.2	180	15.6	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	16.0	16.3	−2%	1,091 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	14.2	17.5	−19%	780 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	15.8	19.4	−19%	773 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	18.1	19.1	−5%	863 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	15.9	17.9	−11%	768 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	13.5	17.6	−23%	624 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	14.5	18.9	−23%	617 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	15.6	20.2	−23%	583 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.