Navalyze · Container · Ship

EPAMINONDAS

IMO: 9153862
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 43,525 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAERSK KALMAR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,549 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

219

Container median 178 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−48%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

80.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,284 t

CO₂ emitted

44,866 t

Distance sailed

65,255 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,278 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 238 kg/nm · median 177 (+34%)

78.8Ranks 1,552 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 85% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+5%)

7.22Ranks 1,164 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU45%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,068 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EPAMINONDAS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EPAMINONDAS
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EPAMINONDAS
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+9%	+11%	+44%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+4%	+15%	−58%	+90%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−4%	−12%	−54%	−7%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−11%	−16%	+142%	−16%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2021	+9.5 kn	+12%	+173%	+1,016%	−33%	9.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	−39%	−53%	+18%	−65%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 39%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	4,346	13,578	18,275	1,167	15.7	238	17.1	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	2,771	8,643	12,712	827	15.4	218	17.7	–
2023	not published	6,275	19,654	29,941	2,148	13.9	210	9.33	–
2022	not published	14,284	44,866	65,255	4,278	15.3	219	10.0	–
2021	not published	6,636	20,877	27,002	1,676	16.1	246	12.0	–
2019	not published	533	1,670	2,420	367	6.6	220	18.0	100%
2018	not published	746	2,359	2,059	244	8.4	362	51.5	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	17.1	16.3	+5%	1,164 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	17.7	17.5	+1%	995 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	9.33	19.4	−52%	336 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	10.0	19.1	−48%	321 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	12.0	17.9	−33%	474 of 1,781	RINA	A
2019	not published	18.0	18.9	−5%	844 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	51.5	20.2	+155%	1,504 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.