Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

BRENAS CARGO

IMO: 9160774
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,315 t
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Las Palmas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: BORE BANK, AKRANES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Smyril Line PF

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,637 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

99.4

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

85.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 90.9 (−6%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,840 t

CO₂ emitted

21,371 t

Distance sailed

68,825 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,047 h

210 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.4 kg/nm · median 105 (−5%)

56.6Ranks 102 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

10.9Faster than 60% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 236 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+148%)

47.4Ranks 194 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,597 t

12.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BRENAS CARGO
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BRENAS CARGO
Ro-ro median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BRENAS CARGO
Ro-ro median

0.0100200300400

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+13%	+10%	−41%	+56%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+9%	+9%	+3%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−25%	−24%	−2%	−36%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+3%	−7%	+18%	−26%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+15%	+17%	−3%	−11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.2 kn	−9%	+12%	+45%	+262%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	−7%	−20%	+1%	–	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Smyril Line PF	3,388	10,592	41,656	2,705	15.4	81.3	147	–
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	6,739	21,063	67,825	4,474	15.2	99.4	236	–
2024	Smyril Line PF	10,113	31,578	114,828	7,392	15.5	88.1	151	–
2023	not published	8,982	28,054	111,426	7,159	15.6	80.6	130	–
2022	not published	12,087	37,732	113,189	7,371	15.4	107	204	–
2021	not published	9,939	31,038	96,232	5,631	17.1	103	277	–
2020	not published	8,984	28,089	99,707	5,947	16.8	90.1	309	–
2019	not published	6,840	21,371	68,825	5,047	13.6	99.4	85.4	–
2018	not published	7,356	23,001	68,470	4,372	15.7	107	94.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Smyril Line PF	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	236	95.2	+148%	194 of 235	DNV	A
2024	Smyril Line PF	151	97.5	+55%	155 of 220	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	130	109	+19%	129 of 221	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	204	90.6	+125%	188 of 223	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	277	104	+167%	197 of 219	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	309	103	+201%	215 of 238	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	85.4	90.9	−6%	123 of 271	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.