Navalyze · Container · Ship

MANDO

IMO: 9175705
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,546 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.49 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,526 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

84.9

Container median 178 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

35.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+85%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,925 t

CO₂ emitted

12,302 t

Distance sailed

46,239 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,145 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 88.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−50%)

78.8Ranks 380 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 49.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+205%)

7.22Ranks 2,020 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports56%
From the EU17%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

980 t

8.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MANDO
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MANDO
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MANDO
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+5%	+0%	−26%	+44%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+13%	+5%	−11%	+8%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−12%	−6%	−4%	−9%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+5%	−5%	−10%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+10%	+7%	−1%	+37%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−8%	+4%	+2%	+6%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+3%	+2%	+0%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	2,586	8,098	29,368	2,772	10.6	88.0	49.7	–
2024	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	3,312	10,393	39,573	3,544	11.2	83.7	34.6	–
2023	not published	3,301	10,348	44,400	3,713	12.0	74.4	32.2	–
2022	not published	3,925	12,302	46,239	4,145	11.2	84.9	35.4	–
2021	not published	4,171	13,070	51,364	4,204	12.2	81.2	34.3	–
2020	not published	3,810	11,937	51,783	4,119	12.6	73.6	25.0	–
2019	not published	4,062	12,717	50,817	4,573	11.1	79.9	23.5	–
2018	not published	3,911	12,248	50,650	4,482	11.3	77.2	26.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	49.7	16.3	+205%	2,020 of 2,208	DNV	A+C
2024	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	34.6	17.5	+97%	1,542 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	32.2	19.4	+66%	1,386 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	35.4	19.1	+85%	1,407 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	34.3	17.9	+92%	1,396 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	25.0	17.6	+42%	1,226 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	23.5	18.9	+24%	1,080 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	26.3	20.2	+30%	1,084 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.