Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG
Ships48
CO₂ emitted250 kt+44.6%
Fuel per mile41 kg/nm
Average speed9.8 kn
CO₂ at berth6.5%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentGeneral cargo

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG30.7 (+21%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG4430.7+21%379.74,1826.4%–
Segment median 25.50%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG49.8 (+206%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG449.8+206%8311.13,8486.5%–
Segment median 16.30%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KGDNV (48)100%0%88%0%

Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
LEMLAND9415040General cargo54.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+115%10.93,018 t€153k
NORRBOTTEN9191931General cargo53.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+112%9.66,052 t€318k
DALSLAND9226774General cargo48.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+92%9.64,622 t€236k
TORNEDALEN9190808General cargo44.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+74%9.75,941 t€312k
KURLAND9226803General cargo43.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+69%8.84,386 t€218k
VARMLAND9191943General cargo42.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+66%9.25,682 t€288k
LETTLAND9237022General cargo41.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+62%9.74,636 t€243k
DALARNA9165085General cargo40.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+57%9.52,604 t€137k
ESTLAND9247314General cargo38.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+50%9.74,081 t€214k
SILVA9237010General cargo37.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+48%9.13,986 t€209k
FINNLAND9301598General cargo37.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+47%9.65,073 t€266k
LIVLAND9237034General cargo36.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+45%9.74,255 t€223k
AMBERLAND9518969General cargo34.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+37%9.23,257 t€167k
HAVELLAND9499735General cargo34.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+34%9.35,116 t€239k
HUMBER RUNNER9467184General cargo34.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+34%10.73,759 t€114k
OSTERBOTTEN9247120General cargo33.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+31%9.94,516 t€229k
HUMBER SPRINTER9467172General cargo33.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+30%10.33,751 t€114k
LAPPLAND9505132General cargo33.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+30%9.94,424 t€225k
VASTERBOTTEN9436226General cargo32.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+26%9.84,808 t€252k
HALLAND9436238General cargo31.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+22%9.04,924 t€259k
SEELAND9301603General cargo31.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+22%9.55,600 t€268k
NYLAND9436240General cargo30.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+20%9.75,092 t€267k
SAMSKIP AMINA9448683Container52.9 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+18%12.213,462 t€621k
ALAND9350783General cargo29.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+14%9.45,455 t€251k
JADELAND9518983General cargo28.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+13%7.82,952 t€123k
MERITO9167942Container49.9 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+12%9.67,340 t€233k
RUBYLAND9518995General cargo28.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+11%9.13,690 t€183k
MANDO9175705Container49.7 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+11%10.68,098 t€291k
FEMBRIA9350771General cargo27.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+9%9.55,427 t€247k
LOLLAND9973262General cargo26.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+3%9.63,616 t€162k

30 of 48 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.