Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

TERA JET

IMO
9179660
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EIV 36.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jambo Jet Maritime Co

?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
–
g CO₂/pax·nm
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2022

Set against all 394 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 381.9 kg/nm · median 157.2 (+143%)
79.7Ranks 392 of 394, lowest first241.1
Average speedThis ship 22.7 kn · median 16.0 (+42%)
12.3Faster than 91% of ro-pax ships22.6
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,163.74 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 626.32 (+86%)
71.52Ranks 304 of 394, lowest first1,606.41
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 4,204.84 g CO₂/t·nm · median 252.90 (+1,563%)
66.27Ranks 389 of 394, lowest first1,134.70
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • TERA JET
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • TERA JET
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024–––––
2022→2023–––––
2018→2022−7.6 kn+12%−16%−48%–7.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Jambo Jet Maritime Co00–0––––
2024Jambo Jet Maritime Co00–0––––
2023not published00–0––––
2022not published4,63114,84612,12553422.7381.9––
2018not published8,00625,66823,44177330.3341.6––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Jambo Jet Maritime Co–––––––EMICERTA
2024Jambo Jet Maritime Co–––––––EMICERTA
2023not published–––––––EMICERTA
2022not published1,163.74626.32+86%304 of 3944,204.84252.90+1,563%EMICERTA
2018not published–––––––EMICERTA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

TERA JET (IMO 9179660): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze