Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

FINBO CARGO

IMO: 9181106
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: EckerÖ
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Rederi Ab Eckero

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

190

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

567

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−0%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

329

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+48%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

65.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,920 t

CO₂ emitted

28,025 t

Distance sailed

46,983 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,283 h

137 days, 37% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 139 kg/nm · median 150 (−7%)

69.3Ranks 165 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 15.8 (−9%)

12.0Faster than 32% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 97.9 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−83%)

66.8Ranks 72 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 170 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−33%)

48.6Ranks 155 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,072 t

11.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FINBO CARGO
Ro-pax median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FINBO CARGO
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

FINBO CARGO
Ro-pax median

150200250300350400

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

FINBO CARGO
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	+1%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	+8%	−19%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−10%	−4%	+22%	−92%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−5%	−17%	−17%	+881%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	+8%	+26%	+44%	−19%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	−18%	−28%	−3%	−70%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Rederi Ab Eckero	10,137	32,473	72,767	5,068	14.4	139	–	–
2024	Rederi Ab Eckero	10,382	33,284	72,374	5,068	14.3	143	–	–
2023	not published	9,472	30,350	66,869	4,829	13.8	142	–	–
2022	not published	8,650	27,299	54,675	4,238	12.9	158	–	–
2021	not published	10,998	34,717	65,835	4,500	14.6	167	–	–
2020	not published	7,094	22,358	45,706	3,643	12.5	155	–	–
2019	not published	8,920	28,025	46,983	3,283	14.3	190	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Rederi Ab Eckero	97.9	567	−83%	72 of 408	170	253	−33%	Verifavia	C
2024	Rederi Ab Eckero	90.2	547	−83%	67 of 404	213	233	−8%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	112	680	−84%	65 of 386	352	234	+51%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	1,364	626	+118%	345 of 394	289	253	+14%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	139	815	−83%	82 of 377	352	226	+56%	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	173	751	−77%	92 of 387	367	217	+69%	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	567	569	−0%	196 of 394	329	223	+48%	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.