Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

MISTRAL

IMO: 9183788
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Brando
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.93 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oy Trailer-Link AB

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

84.8

Con-ro median 127 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

31.4

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 8.53 (+268%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Con-ro median 15.7 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,527 t

CO₂ emitted

17,499 t

Distance sailed

65,153 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,978 h

166 days, 45% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.4 kg/nm · median 135 (−46%)

95.0Ranks 3 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 13.9 (−14%)

12.9Faster than 5% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 49.6 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+400%)

4.60Ranks 58 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU30%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

709 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MISTRAL
Con-ro median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MISTRAL
Con-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MISTRAL
Con-ro median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	−47%	−34%	+497%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 47%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−6.4 kn	+64%	−2%	−88%	–	6.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 64%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	−3%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−6%	−9%	−3%	−12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	+59%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	−5%	+19%	+0%	+63%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−2%	−5%	−6%	−7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Oy Trailer-Link AB	4,991	15,727	68,007	5,700	11.9	73.4	–	–
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	1,564	4,996	11,384	1,188	9.6	137	–	–
2023	not published	8,165	26,177	97,633	6,104	16.0	83.6	–	–
2022	not published	8,080	25,903	101,133	6,320	16.0	79.9	–	–
2021	not published	8,857	28,396	103,755	6,297	16.5	85.4	–	–
2020	not published	5,527	17,499	65,153	3,978	16.4	84.8	–	–
2019	not published	5,766	18,385	64,847	4,947	13.1	88.9	–	–
2018	not published	6,232	19,570	68,663	5,095	13.5	90.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Oy Trailer-Link AB	49.6	9.92	+400%	58 of 58	DNV	B+C
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2023	not published	19.8	8.42	+135%	52 of 56	DNV	B
2022	not published	21.6	7.68	+182%	55 of 59	DNV	B
2021	not published	24.5	8.10	+203%	53 of 62	DNV	B
2020	not published	31.4	8.53	+268%	56 of 69	DNV	B
2019	not published	19.2	9.58	+101%	49 of 67	DNV	B
2018	not published	20.7	11.6	+79%	56 of 65	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.