Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

VICTORINE

IMO: 9184029
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,380 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CLDN FERRIES NV · part of CLdN

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,643 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.9

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

82.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 90.9 (−9%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,480 t

CO₂ emitted

17,267 t

Distance sailed

57,160 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,306 h

179 days, 49% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.3 kg/nm · median 105 (−13%)

56.6Ranks 73 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 14.4 (−4%)

10.9Faster than 40% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 85.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−10%)

47.4Ranks 98 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,960 t

11.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VICTORINE
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VICTORINE
Ro-ro median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VICTORINE
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.0 kn	−2%	+14%	+40%	−69%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+6%	+14%	−10%	+1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−1%	−18%	−34%	+171%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−1%	−3%	+15%	+7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	+17%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−4%	−1%	+13%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+1%	−5%	−24%	+8%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CLDN FERRIES NV	6,503	20,594	71,287	5,112	13.9	91.2	84.4	–
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	6,697	21,210	73,341	5,308	13.8	91.3	85.6	–
2024	CLDN FERRIES NV	4,900	15,569	52,448	4,435	11.8	93.4	275	–
2023	not published	5,087	16,114	57,963	5,230	11.1	87.8	273	–
2022	not published	7,712	24,323	87,268	6,544	13.3	88.4	101	–
2021	not published	6,767	21,210	75,871	5,542	13.7	89.2	94.1	–
2020	not published	5,969	18,712	64,603	4,749	13.6	92.4	108	–
2019	not published	5,480	17,267	57,160	4,306	13.3	95.9	82.9	–
2018	not published	7,092	22,347	74,994	5,284	14.2	94.6	76.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CLDN FERRIES NV	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	85.6	95.2	−10%	98 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	CLDN FERRIES NV	275	97.5	+182%	192 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	273	109	+151%	185 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	101	90.6	+11%	130 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	94.1	104	−9%	98 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	108	103	+5%	128 of 238	DNV	C
2019	not published	82.9	90.9	−9%	114 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	76.9	91.0	−16%	86 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.