Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MAXINE

IMO: 9188245
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,660 t
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SLINGEBORG, GOTHIA SEAWAYS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHIPLUX VIII S.A. · part of Shiplux

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,660 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

87.0 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

75.38

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−21%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,279 t

CO₂ emitted

19,900 t

20,208 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

72,139 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,867 h

203 days, 56% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 87.0 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−17%)

56.6Ranks 56 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

10.9Faster than 57% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 75.38 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−21%)

47.35Ranks 77 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU8%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU6%

6% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,242 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAXINE
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAXINE
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAXINE
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	−22%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	+9%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−2%	+11%	+11%	−7%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−3%	−10%	+20%	−34%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	−2%	−13%	+5%	+32%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+4%	+0%	−42%	+45%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−2%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	5,891	18,659	68,454	4,613	14.8	86.1	73.09	–
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	6,279	19,900	72,139	4,867	14.8	87.0	75.38	–
2024	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	7,776	24,445	92,302	6,317	14.6	84.2	73.39	–
2023	not published	7,094	22,301	84,860	6,034	14.1	83.6	74.77	–
2022	not published	6,482	20,383	76,330	6,134	12.4	84.9	80.29	–
2021	not published	5,549	17,638	63,470	4,715	13.5	87.4	120.97	–
2020	not published	5,395	16,869	60,566	4,003	15.1	89.1	91.82	–
2019	not published	9,016	28,094	105,035	6,702	15.7	85.8	63.16	–
2018	not published	9,270	28,885	107,351	6,770	15.9	86.3	54.72	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	75.38	95.19	−21%	77 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	73.39	97.53	−25%	61 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	74.77	108.62	−31%	63 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	80.29	90.62	−11%	86 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	120.97	103.64	+17%	133 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	91.82	102.77	−11%	99 of 238	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	63.16	90.89	−31%	56 of 271	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	54.72	91.03	−40%	38 of 260	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.