Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MAXINE

IMO: 9188245
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,660 t
Flag (estimated): United Kingdom
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SLINGEBORG, GOTHIA SEAWAYS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHIPLUX VIII S.A. · part of CLdN

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,917 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

86.3

Ro-ro median 108 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

54.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 91.0 (−40%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Ro-ro median 14.7 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,270 t

CO₂ emitted

28,885 t

Distance sailed

107,351 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,770 h

282 days, 77% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.0 kg/nm · median 105 (−17%)

56.6Ranks 56 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

10.9Faster than 57% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 75.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−21%)

47.4Ranks 77 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports100%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

133 t

0.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAXINE
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAXINE
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAXINE
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	−22%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	+9%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−2%	+11%	+11%	−7%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−3%	−10%	+20%	−34%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	−2%	−13%	+5%	+32%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+4%	+0%	−42%	+45%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−2%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	5,891	18,659	68,454	4,613	14.8	86.1	73.1	–
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	6,279	19,900	72,139	4,867	14.8	87.0	75.4	–
2024	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	7,776	24,445	92,302	6,317	14.6	84.2	73.4	–
2023	not published	7,094	22,301	84,860	6,034	14.1	83.6	74.8	–
2022	not published	6,482	20,383	76,330	6,134	12.4	84.9	80.3	–
2021	not published	5,549	17,638	63,470	4,715	13.5	87.4	121	–
2020	not published	5,395	16,869	60,566	4,003	15.1	89.1	91.8	–
2019	not published	9,016	28,094	105,035	6,702	15.7	85.8	63.2	–
2018	not published	9,270	28,885	107,351	6,770	15.9	86.3	54.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	75.4	95.2	−21%	77 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	SHIPLUX VIII S.A.	73.4	97.5	−25%	61 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	74.8	109	−31%	63 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	80.3	90.6	−11%	86 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	121	104	+17%	133 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	91.8	103	−11%	99 of 238	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	63.2	90.9	−31%	56 of 271	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	54.7	91.0	−40%	38 of 260	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.