Navalyze · Container · Ship

TOKYO EXPRESS

IMO: 9193290
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 24,254 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.06 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,706 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

183

Container median 174 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−24%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,516 t

CO₂ emitted

17,228 t

Distance sailed

30,131 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,414 h

101 days, 28% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 197 kg/nm · median 177 (+11%)

78.8Ranks 1,252 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 13.3 (+24%)

9.1Faster than 94% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+56%)

7.22Ranks 1,572 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU75%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

684 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TOKYO EXPRESS
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TOKYO EXPRESS
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TOKYO EXPRESS
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+9%	+12%	−91%	+63%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	+8%	+17%	+14%	−12%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+7%	+5%	+15%	+41%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.1 kn	−5%	+20%	+67%	−25%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+5.0 kn	−7%	+61%	+39%	+12%	5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−5.5 kn	−4%	−46%	−17%	+3%	5.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	−2%	−21%	−35%	−13%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	1,426	4,464	7,244	440	16.5	197	25.4	98%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	13,811	43,233	76,535	4,794	16.0	180	15.6	99%
2023	not published	11,234	35,193	67,238	4,564	14.7	167	17.7	96%
2022	not published	9,130	28,533	58,359	3,875	15.1	156	12.5	98%
2021	not published	5,731	17,941	34,974	2,911	12.0	164	16.7	–
2020	not published	4,400	13,781	25,095	3,595	7.0	175	14.9	–
2019	not published	5,516	17,228	30,131	2,414	12.5	183	14.4	–
2018	not published	8,706	27,151	46,627	3,016	15.5	187	16.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	25.4	16.3	+56%	1,572 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	15.6	17.5	−11%	853 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	17.7	19.4	−9%	860 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	12.5	19.1	−34%	520 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	16.7	17.9	−7%	826 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	14.9	17.6	−15%	728 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	14.4	18.9	−24%	606 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	16.5	20.2	−18%	644 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.