Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

COOL GIRL

IMO: 9194921
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,228 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: SANTA LUCIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Baltmed Reefer Services Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,228 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

68.3 kg/nm

Reefer median 82.9 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

175

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 56.80 (+209%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Reefer median 14.6 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

885 t

CO₂ emitted

2,790 t

2,834 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

12,967 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,007 h

42 days, 11% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 68.3 kg/nm · median 82.9 (−18%)

55.8Ranks 31 of 109, lowest first117.7

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 14.6 (−12%)

8.2Faster than 36% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 175.26 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.80 (+209%)

36.74Ranks 101 of 109, lowest first140.03

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU36%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,428 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

COOL GIRL
Reefer median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COOL GIRL
Reefer median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COOL GIRL
Reefer median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+23%	+33%	+84%	+325%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−18%	−23%	−38%	−38%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−17%	−16%	+48%	+80%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.7 kn	+10%	−15%	−38%	−40%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+11.6 kn	−16%	+192%	+15%	−45%	11.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−12.1 kn	−3%	−73%	−66%	+30%	12.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+6%	+10%	+322%	+45%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Baltmed Reefer Services Ltd	885	2,790	12,967	1,007	12.9	68.3	175.26	–
2024	Baltmed Reefer Services Ltd	392	1,237	7,057	592	11.9	55.6	41.24	–
2023	not published	767	2,424	11,335	895	12.7	67.7	66.75	–
2022	not published	624	1,975	7,650	610	12.6	81.5	37.13	–
2021	not published	917	2,891	12,399	761	16.3	73.9	61.61	–
2020	not published	955	2,987	10,790	2,316	4.7	88.5	112.77	–
2019	not published	2,911	9,079	32,055	1,913	16.8	90.8	86.45	–
2018	not published	653	2,036	7,603	473	16.1	85.8	59.63	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Baltmed Reefer Services Ltd	175.26	56.80	+209%	101 of 109	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Baltmed Reefer Services Ltd	41.24	58.69	−30%	19 of 108	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	66.75	55.59	+20%	90 of 135	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	37.13	55.27	−33%	21 of 143	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	61.61	54.99	+12%	99 of 158	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	112.77	59.07	+91%	137 of 149	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	86.45	62.58	+38%	110 of 147	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	59.63	72.84	−18%	45 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.