Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BLUE STAR 1

IMO
9197105
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Greece
Port of registry
Piraeus
Technical efficiency
EEXI 23.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BLUE STAR FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A. · part of Attica Group

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
257
Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+64%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
270
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−64%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
370
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+70%)
Average speed
22.4 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+42%)
Fuel per day at sea
137.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
20,089 t
CO₂ emitted
62,594 t
Distance sailed
78,293 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,497 h
146 days, 40% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 242 kg/nm · median 150 (+61%)
69.3Ranks 382 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 20.1 kn · median 15.8 (+27%)
12.0Faster than 84% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 114 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−80%)
66.8Ranks 84 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 658 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+160%)
48.6Ranks 297 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports98%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,371 t
2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BLUE STAR 1
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • BLUE STAR 1
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BLUE STAR 1
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • BLUE STAR 1
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.0 kn+0%−4%−11%−68%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+1.9 kn+10%+21%+1%−7%1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+2.4 kn+12%+28%+6%−39%2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.4 kn+7%+10%+33%+50%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021−6.0 kn−29%−48%−15%+54%6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.3 kn−1%−3%−24%+13%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019+0.7 kn−2%+2%−1%−18%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025BLUE STAR FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A.20,60364,66285,2124,24320.1242––
2024BLUE STAR FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A.23,08371,95595,9454,54621.1241––
2023not published20,71664,57994,7504,92819.2219––
2022not published17,34354,03589,1125,28916.8195––
2021not published12,13937,82166,9124,07616.4181––
2020not published20,08962,59478,2933,49722.4257––
2019not published26,68584,126102,5334,52122.7260––
2018not published27,50786,718104,0524,74022.0264––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025BLUE STAR FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A.114567−80%84 of 408658253+160%VerifaviaB
2024BLUE STAR FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A.354547−35%154 of 404476233+104%VerifaviaB
2023not published381680−44%125 of 386494234+111%Verifavia–
2022not published622626−1%197 of 394630253+149%VerifaviaB
2021not published416815−49%138 of 377599226+165%VerifaviaB
2020not published270751−64%114 of 387370217+70%VerifaviaB
2019not published239569−58%118 of 394336223+51%VerifaviaB
2018not published291729−60%115 of 361386184+110%VerifaviaB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.