Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SCHIPPERSGRACHT

IMO: 9197363
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

93.7

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+70%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+24%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+31%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,017 t

CO₂ emitted

18,762 t

Distance sailed

64,195 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,570 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.5 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+168%)

17.4Ranks 2,644 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 9.3 (+56%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+9%)

10.2Ranks 1,568 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU40%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

452 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SCHIPPERSGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SCHIPPERSGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SCHIPPERSGRACHT
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−21%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	−5%	+6%	+14%	+9%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	+0%	−13%	−4%	+4%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+2%	+6%	−1%	+18%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+4%	+7%	−7%	−20%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−3%	−6%	−12%	+49%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−3%	+1%	+29%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	4,821	15,068	50,984	3,523	14.5	94.5	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	6,169	19,253	64,421	4,465	14.4	95.8	–	–
2023	not published	5,671	17,708	56,425	4,346	13.0	101	–	–
2022	not published	5,900	18,429	58,953	3,938	15.0	100	–	–
2021	not published	5,823	18,161	59,469	4,127	14.4	97.9	–	–
2020	not published	6,017	18,762	64,195	4,570	14.0	93.7	–	–
2019	not published	7,035	21,928	72,998	5,029	14.5	96.4	29.9	–
2018	not published	5,584	17,418	56,386	4,027	14.0	99.0	26.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	27.8	25.5	+9%	1,568 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	32.4	19.3	+68%	937 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	29.6	20.7	+43%	815 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	28.5	21.6	+32%	737 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	24.3	22.7	+7%	656 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	30.4	24.5	+24%	822 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	20.4	25.0	−18%	367 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	21.4	24.9	−14%	389 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.