Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SINGELGRACHT

IMO: 9197375
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,281 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.3

General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (+63%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

25.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (+2%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+51%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,202 t

CO₂ emitted

22,451 t

Distance sailed

75,561 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,178 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+168%)

17.4Ranks 2,639 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 9.3 (+57%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 26.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+2%)

10.2Ranks 1,427 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU32%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

588 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SINGELGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SINGELGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SINGELGRACHT
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+2%	+3%	+4%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−1%	+3%	−2%	−6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−11%	−15%	−1%	+10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+2%	+5%	−6%	−13%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+6%	+5%	−0%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−1%	+13%	−8%	−3%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	+3%	−12%	−6%	+0%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,868	18,356	62,328	4,271	14.6	94.2	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,547	17,309	59,805	4,148	14.4	92.8	–	–
2023	not published	5,728	17,882	61,320	4,389	14.0	93.4	47.5	–
2022	not published	6,500	20,294	61,743	4,240	14.6	105	–	–
2021	not published	6,724	20,974	65,403	4,599	14.2	103	–	–
2020	not published	6,387	19,917	65,640	4,604	14.3	97.3	–	–
2019	not published	6,945	21,655	71,013	5,673	12.5	97.8	–	–
2018	not published	7,202	22,451	75,561	5,178	14.6	95.3	35.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	26.1	25.5	+2%	1,427 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	29.3	19.3	+52%	885 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	31.2	20.7	+51%	846 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	28.4	21.6	+31%	732 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	32.7	22.7	+44%	922 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	24.8	24.5	+1%	596 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	25.4	25.0	+2%	592 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	25.4	24.9	+2%	542 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.