Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SPIEGELGRACHT

IMO: 9197911
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

96.3

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+75%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

26.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+10%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+19%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,178 t

CO₂ emitted

22,373 t

Distance sailed

74,563 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,871 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 92.5 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+163%)

17.4Ranks 2,628 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 9.3 (+59%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−5%)

10.2Ranks 1,204 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU39%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

398 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPIEGELGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPIEGELGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SPIEGELGRACHT
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+1%	+6%	−29%	−20%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	+28%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−9%	−15%	−31%	−8%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+5%	+11%	+14%	+25%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+2%	+17%	−17%	−18%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−1%	−7%	+34%	+9%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−2%	−5%	−1%	−18%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	4,092	12,782	44,218	2,989	14.8	92.5	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,769	17,997	62,675	4,449	14.1	92.0	–	–
2023	not published	4,625	14,432	49,080	3,453	14.2	94.2	–	–
2022	not published	7,287	22,724	70,735	4,621	15.3	103	–	–
2021	not published	6,078	18,960	61,968	4,265	14.5	98.1	–	–
2020	not published	7,178	22,373	74,563	5,871	12.7	96.3	–	–
2019	not published	5,373	16,761	55,505	4,096	13.6	96.8	34.2	1%
2018	not published	5,524	17,228	56,199	4,008	14.0	98.3	39.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	24.1	25.5	−5%	1,204 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	30.0	19.3	+56%	903 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	25.3	20.7	+23%	705 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	27.7	21.6	+28%	714 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	22.1	22.7	−3%	539 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	26.9	24.5	+10%	685 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	24.6	25.0	−1%	565 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	29.9	24.9	+20%	671 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.