Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

FEDERAL OSHIMA

IMO: 9200330
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 22,166 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.12 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Federal Oceans Ltd. · part of Federal (Fednav)

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,166 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

60.8 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.67

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+10%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,644 t

CO₂ emitted

5,198 t

5,279 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

27,048 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,783 h

116 days, 32% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 60.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−26%)

61.0Ranks 350 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 10.7 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 21% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+10%)

4.80Ranks 2,155 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU30%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU4%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,824 t).

Fuel burned laden

81%

19% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FEDERAL OSHIMA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FEDERAL OSHIMA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FEDERAL OSHIMA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−14%	−10%	+87%	−2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+0%	−9%	−59%	−24%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−3%	−12%	+56%	−9%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	+145%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	−6%	+12%	−68%	+58%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−4%	−16%	−5%	+21%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+3%	+7%	+31%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Federal Oceans Ltd.	1,644	5,198	27,048	2,783	9.7	60.8	8.67	81%
2024	Federal Oceans Ltd.	1,027	3,239	14,499	1,556	9.3	70.8	8.85	88%
2023	not published	2,509	7,952	35,561	3,471	10.2	70.6	11.58	77%
2022	not published	1,659	5,266	22,761	2,018	11.3	72.9	12.66	74%
2021	not published	656	2,080	9,276	836	11.1	70.7	19.15	64%
2020	not published	2,155	6,834	28,756	3,073	9.4	74.9	12.14	86%
2019	not published	2,354	7,418	30,310	2,810	10.8	77.7	10.00	90%
2018	not published	1,754	5,524	23,184	2,250	10.3	75.7	10.36	86%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Federal Oceans Ltd.	8.67	7.89	+10%	2,155 of 3,610	ABS	B+C
2024	Federal Oceans Ltd.	8.85	8.09	+9%	1,807 of 3,089	ABS	C
2023	not published	11.58	8.27	+40%	2,693 of 3,548	ABS	C
2022	not published	12.66	8.71	+45%	3,127 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	19.15	8.57	+123%	3,279 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	12.14	8.24	+47%	2,586 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.00	8.38	+19%	2,241 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	10.36	8.50	+22%	2,348 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.