Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

COMMODORE CLIPPER

IMO
9201750
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EEXI 32.43 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Condor Marine Services Ltd

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
79.0 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−47%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,815
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+220%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
131
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−48%)
Average speed
12.6 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−20%)
Fuel per day at sea
23.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,831 t
CO₂ emitted
15,489 t
15,726 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
61,188 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,854 h
202 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 79.0 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−47%)
69.3Ranks 60 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 15.8 (−20%)
12.0Faster than 13% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,815.10 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+220%)
66.76Ranks 380 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 130.68 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−48%)
48.59Ranks 125 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports45%
  • From the EU23%
  • Into the EU28%
  • At berth in the EU4%

75% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,554 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • COMMODORE CLIPPER
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • COMMODORE CLIPPER
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • COMMODORE CLIPPER
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • COMMODORE CLIPPER
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.3 kn+6%+3%+192%+128%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+2.6 kn−24%−5%+7,611%+55%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+3.9 kn+41%+125%−64%−85%3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 41%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−2.6 kn−14%−38%−42%+245%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−5.2 kn+0%−37%−98%−42%5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.2 kn−11%−10%−11%+166%Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.5 kn+27%+22%−7%+51%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Condor Marine Services Ltd4,83115,48961,1884,85412.679.0––
2024Condor Marine Services Ltd1,5635,01120,9751,62312.974.5––
2023not published27862722610.398.1––
2022not published531707611186.469.7––
2021not published1053381,3071469.080.6––
2020not published4,91115,74360,8984,30014.280.6––
2019not published6,22019,94168,6774,90914.090.6––
2018not published5,30317,00274,0445,10814.571.6––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Condor Marine Services Ltd1,815.10566.51+220%380 of 408130.68253.18−48%Bureau VeritasA
2024Condor Marine Services Ltd795.84546.68+46%256 of 404337.85232.85+45%DNVB
2023not published512.99680.04−25%157 of 386576.20233.94+146%DNVB
2022not published3,422.08626.32+446%386 of 394185.09252.90−27%DNVB
2021not published991.41815.19+22%221 of 377333.40226.00+48%DNVB
2020not published1,704.79750.91+127%309 of 387245.45217.49+13%DNVB
2019not published640.84569.03+13%216 of 394264.93222.56+19%DNVB
2018not published424.22728.92−42%141 of 361235.69184.05+28%DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.