Navalyze · Container · Ship

ILHA DA MADEIRA

IMO: 9202077
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,329 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: RS MISTRAL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,329 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

65.5 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

61.41

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+277%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,108 t

CO₂ emitted

12,822 t

13,024 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

62,712 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,040 h

210 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 65.5 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−63%)

78.8Ranks 71 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 36% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 61.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+277%)

7.22Ranks 2,122 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

1% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (89 t).

Fuel burned laden

100%

0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ILHA DA MADEIRA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ILHA DA MADEIRA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ILHA DA MADEIRA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−4%	−3%	+82%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+14%	+24%	−44%	−4%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−1%	+6%	+47%	−4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+6%	+19%	−8%	+9%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+6%	+7%	−2%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−21%	−9%	+49%	+5%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	+6%	+21%	−6%	+9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	4,108	12,822	62,712	5,040	12.4	65.5	61.41	100%
2024part-year	Myklebusthaug Management AS	255	805	3,354	335	10.0	76.0	151.61	–
2024	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	2,350	7,355	34,484	2,778	12.4	68.2	68.45	89%
2023	not published	3,655	11,564	61,360	5,358	11.5	59.6	70.99	–
2022	not published	2,514	7,893	41,856	3,924	10.7	60.1	74.25	–
2021	not published	2,584	8,063	45,436	4,795	9.5	56.9	–	–
2020	not published	2,491	7,775	46,228	4,959	9.3	53.9	–	–
2019	not published	2,112	6,608	31,030	3,807	8.2	68.1	67.74	–
2018	not published	2,115	6,617	32,859	4,629	7.1	64.4	62.25	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	61.41	16.30	+277%	2,122 of 2,208	Tecnoveritas	A
2024part-year	Myklebusthaug Management AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	68.45	17.52	+291%	1,903 of 1,974	Tecnoveritas	A
2023	not published	70.99	19.40	+266%	1,850 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	74.25	19.13	+288%	1,778 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	68.28	22.70	+201%	1,108 of 1,142	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	71.36	24.50	+191%	1,117 of 1,167	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	67.74	18.88	+259%	1,704 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	62.25	20.22	+208%	1,591 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.