Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Myklebusthaug Management ASyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 61 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 68 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Myklebusthaug Management AS60.7 (+246% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | 6 | 60.7 | +246% | 72 | 11.5 | 4,187 | 5.4% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3
- Myklebusthaug Management AS59.0 (+207% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | 1 | 59.0 | +207% | 44 | 9.8 | 3,890 | 1.6% | – |
| Segment median | 19.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | DNV (7) | 71% | 29% | 29% | 0% |
Myklebusthaug Management AS: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRINNA | 9318955 | General cargo | 59.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +207% | 9.8 | 5,349 t | €109k |
| RUMBA | 9264714 | Container | 71.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +52% | 12.6 | 13,010 t | €327k |
| CONESTE | 9252802 | Container | 68.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +45% | 14.3 | 13,241 t | €395k |
| RS LISA | 9287704 | Container | 60.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +28% | 9.7 | 7,508 t | €168k |
| DINA TRADER | 9354442 | Container | 50.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +6% | 9.7 | 7,864 t | €159k |
| ANDREA | 9333357 | Container | 47.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | 0% | 10.3 | 12,801 t | €276k |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.