Navalyze · Container · Ship

ILHA DA MADEIRA

IMO: 9202077
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,329 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: RS MISTRAL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,235 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

64.4

Container median 182 kg/nm (−65%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

62.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+208%)

Average speed

7.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−49%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,115 t

CO₂ emitted

6,617 t

Distance sailed

32,859 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,629 h

193 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−63%)

78.8Ranks 71 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 36% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 61.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+277%)

7.22Ranks 2,122 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU27%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

226 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ILHA DA MADEIRA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ILHA DA MADEIRA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ILHA DA MADEIRA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−4%	−3%	+82%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+14%	+24%	−44%	−4%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−1%	+6%	+47%	−4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+6%	+19%	−8%	+9%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+6%	+7%	−2%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−21%	−9%	+49%	+5%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	+6%	+21%	−6%	+9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	4,108	12,822	62,712	5,040	12.4	65.5	61.4	100%
2024part-year	Myklebusthaug Management AS	255	805	3,354	335	10.0	76.0	152	–
2024	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	2,350	7,355	34,484	2,778	12.4	68.2	68.5	89%
2023	not published	3,655	11,564	61,360	5,358	11.5	59.6	71.0	–
2022	not published	2,514	7,893	41,856	3,924	10.7	60.1	74.3	–
2021	not published	2,584	8,063	45,436	4,795	9.5	56.9	–	–
2020	not published	2,491	7,775	46,228	4,959	9.3	53.9	–	–
2019	not published	2,112	6,608	31,030	3,807	8.2	68.1	67.7	–
2018	not published	2,115	6,617	32,859	4,629	7.1	64.4	62.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	61.4	16.3	+277%	2,122 of 2,208	Tecnoveritas	A
2024part-year	Myklebusthaug Management AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	S&C-Shipmanagement & Crewing Ltd.	68.5	17.5	+291%	1,903 of 1,974	Tecnoveritas	A
2023	not published	71.0	19.4	+266%	1,850 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	74.3	19.1	+288%	1,778 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	68.3	22.7	+201%	1,108 of 1,142	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	71.4	24.5	+191%	1,117 of 1,167	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	67.7	18.9	+259%	1,704 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	62.3	20.2	+208%	1,591 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.