Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SCHELDEGRACHT

IMO: 9202510
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

99.9

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+81%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

24.2

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (−1%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,426 t

CO₂ emitted

20,050 t

Distance sailed

64,315 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,779 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 90.7 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+158%)

17.4Ranks 2,611 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 9.3 (+30%)

6.9Faster than 90% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 32.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+27%)

10.2Ranks 1,920 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU30%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,891 t

9.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SCHELDEGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SCHELDEGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SCHELDEGRACHT
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.3 kn	−8%	−23%	−3%	+22%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−3%	−0%	−15%	+2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−1%	−5%	−8%	+2%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−15%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	−2%	+9%	+11%	+0%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+0%	+2%	+15%	+15%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+7%	−4%	−20%	−7%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	4,177	13,048	46,033	3,820	12.1	90.7	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	4,686	14,626	47,702	3,304	14.4	98.2	–	–
2023	not published	5,642	17,623	56,000	3,970	14.1	101	–	–
2022	not published	6,140	19,165	60,544	4,103	14.8	101	–	–
2021	not published	6,993	21,802	71,149	4,774	14.9	98.3	–	–
2020	not published	6,426	20,050	64,315	4,779	13.5	99.9	–	–
2019	not published	5,597	17,456	56,041	4,242	13.2	99.9	30.2	–
2018	not published	6,578	20,514	70,392	4,790	14.7	93.5	33.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	32.4	25.5	+27%	1,920 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	26.5	19.3	+38%	823 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	26.0	20.7	+26%	727 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	25.6	21.6	+18%	653 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	24.3	22.7	+7%	656 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	24.2	24.5	−1%	568 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	21.1	25.0	−15%	394 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	22.7	24.9	−9%	440 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.