Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SLUISGRACHT

IMO: 9202522
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

101

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (+80%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

25.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (+11%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (+31%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,923 t

CO₂ emitted

18,471 t

Distance sailed

58,904 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,119 h

172 days, 47% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+159%)

17.4Ranks 2,617 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 9.3 (+49%)

6.9Faster than 98% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 23.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−8%)

10.2Ranks 1,127 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU38%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

532 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SLUISGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SLUISGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SLUISGRACHT
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−12%	−10%	−12%	−56%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	+4%	+26%	−26%	+68%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.6 kn	−0%	−25%	−27%	+12%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+0%	+4%	+19%	+13%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+8%	+9%	−9%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+7%	+9%	−20%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−9%	−9%	+22%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	3,058	9,563	33,510	2,412	13.9	91.2	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	3,959	12,361	38,083	2,805	13.6	104	–	–
2023	not published	5,151	16,087	51,462	4,575	11.2	100	–	–
2022	not published	7,068	22,058	70,224	4,745	14.8	101	–	–
2021	not published	5,923	18,471	58,904	4,119	14.3	101	–	–
2020	not published	6,052	18,880	64,937	4,596	14.1	93.2	–	–
2019	not published	7,046	21,964	81,235	5,830	13.9	86.7	33.9	–
2018	not published	6,338	19,775	66,496	4,785	13.9	95.3	26.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	23.4	25.5	−8%	1,127 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	53.4	19.3	+177%	1,063 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	31.7	20.7	+53%	857 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	28.4	21.6	+32%	734 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	25.1	22.7	+11%	692 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	23.2	24.5	−6%	520 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	23.2	25.0	−7%	495 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	20.9	24.9	−16%	373 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.