Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SPUIGRACHT

IMO: 9202534
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,113 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.4

General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (+65%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

29.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (+17%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+42%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,602 t

CO₂ emitted

20,583 t

Distance sailed

68,515 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,955 h

206 days, 57% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+159%)

17.4Ranks 2,614 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 9.3 (+54%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−6%)

10.2Ranks 1,195 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU42%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

327 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPUIGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPUIGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SPUIGRACHT
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−8%	−5%	−9%	−17%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	+9%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−3%	−8%	−17%	+26%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+3%	−0%	−13%	−10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+4%	+2%	+3%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	+7%	+26%	+16%	+1%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−3%	−7%	−8%	−14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	4,963	15,536	54,453	3,805	14.3	91.1	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,923	18,500	59,620	4,298	13.9	99.3	–	–
2023	not published	5,627	17,566	54,568	3,836	14.2	103	–	–
2022	not published	6,975	21,771	65,473	4,386	14.9	107	–	–
2021	not published	7,794	24,306	75,064	4,890	15.4	104	–	–
2020	not published	7,297	22,753	73,147	4,660	15.7	99.8	–	–
2019	not published	5,860	18,277	62,952	4,725	13.3	93.1	33.3	–
2018	not published	6,602	20,583	68,515	4,955	13.8	96.4	37.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	24.0	25.5	−6%	1,195 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	29.1	19.3	+51%	877 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	31.1	20.7	+51%	845 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	24.8	21.6	+15%	627 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	27.6	22.7	+22%	796 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	25.1	24.5	+3%	606 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	24.9	25.0	−0%	577 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	29.1	24.9	+17%	651 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.