Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SNOEKGRACHT

IMO: 9202546
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

94.3

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+71%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

25.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+6%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+33%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,859 t

CO₂ emitted

21,395 t

Distance sailed

72,735 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,127 h

214 days, 59% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 102 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+189%)

17.4Ranks 2,679 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 9.3 (+54%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−3%)

10.2Ranks 1,288 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU42%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

546 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SNOEKGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SNOEKGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SNOEKGRACHT
General cargo median

18.020.022.024.026.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+11%	+5%	+6%	−1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−6%	+4%	+20%	+1%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+1%	−3%	−20%	−2%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+2%	−4%	+21%	+13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−0%	+7%	−32%	−13%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+1%	+2%	+19%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−2%	−3%	−6%	+14%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	6,240	19,493	61,237	4,295	14.3	102	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,284	16,489	57,655	3,807	15.1	91.7	–	–
2023	not published	4,674	14,597	47,913	3,515	13.6	97.5	–	–
2022	not published	5,746	17,933	59,675	4,185	14.3	96.3	–	–
2021	not published	4,644	14,485	49,292	3,242	15.2	94.2	–	–
2020	not published	6,859	21,395	72,735	5,127	14.2	94.3	–	–
2019	not published	5,732	17,877	61,111	4,359	14.0	93.8	–	–
2018	not published	6,215	19,381	65,102	4,566	14.3	95.5	29.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	24.8	25.5	−3%	1,288 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	25.0	19.3	+30%	781 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	24.8	20.7	+20%	681 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	25.3	21.6	+17%	646 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	22.5	22.7	−1%	558 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	25.9	24.5	+6%	644 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	24.6	25.0	−1%	565 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	21.5	24.9	−13%	395 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.