Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SPAARNEGRACHT

IMO: 9202558
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

97.2

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (+62%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

22.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+11%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+37%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,858 t

CO₂ emitted

15,167 t

Distance sailed

49,955 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,462 h

144 days, 40% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+169%)

17.4Ranks 2,644 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 9.3 (+57%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 19.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−22%)

10.2Ranks 817 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU45%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

569 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPAARNEGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPAARNEGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SPAARNEGRACHT
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+4%	+3%	−11%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−7%	−4%	+15%	+30%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	−3%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+0%	−3%	−14%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	+11%	+24%	−19%	+12%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−3%	−14%	−2%	+1%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.0 kn	−9%	+5%	+42%	−12%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	4,894	15,301	51,615	3,543	14.6	94.8	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,237	16,337	57,696	3,900	14.8	90.8	–	–
2023	not published	4,858	15,167	49,955	3,462	14.4	97.2	–	–
2022	not published	5,160	16,113	51,396	3,532	14.6	100	–	–
2021	not published	5,958	18,586	59,589	3,947	15.1	100	–	–
2020	not published	6,601	20,582	73,389	5,408	13.6	90.0	–	–
2019	not published	6,919	21,579	74,534	4,885	15.3	92.8	38.6	–
2018	not published	5,351	16,702	52,407	3,954	13.3	102	39.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	19.9	25.5	−22%	817 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	29.8	19.3	+55%	899 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	22.9	20.7	+11%	618 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	28.1	21.6	+30%	727 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	28.6	22.7	+26%	833 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	25.4	24.5	+4%	619 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	25.1	25.0	+1%	582 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	28.4	24.9	+14%	630 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.