Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MEGA EXPRESS TWO

IMO: 9203186
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Forship SpA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

247

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

122

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−79%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,330

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+497%)

Average speed

18.6 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

22,513 t

CO₂ emitted

70,198 t

Distance sailed

91,249 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,895 h

204 days, 56% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 195 kg/nm · median 150 (+30%)

69.3Ranks 323 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 15.8 (+5%)

12.0Faster than 58% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 96.6 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−83%)

66.8Ranks 71 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,022 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+304%)

48.6Ranks 347 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,752 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MEGA EXPRESS TWO
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MEGA EXPRESS TWO
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MEGA EXPRESS TWO
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MEGA EXPRESS TWO
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−11%	−8%	−2%	−7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+14%	+13%	−8%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−17%	−22%	−8%	−6%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+2%	−6%	−8%	−3%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−1%	+3%	+20%	−13%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−6%	−10%	−14%	−2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−5%	−9%	−1%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Forship SpA	13,893	44,485	71,401	4,309	16.6	195	–	–
2024	Forship SpA	15,963	49,850	73,065	4,552	16.0	219	–	–
2023	not published	15,218	47,464	79,080	4,890	16.2	192	–	–
2022	not published	19,959	62,269	86,160	4,979	17.3	232	–	–
2021	not published	21,307	66,475	93,499	5,000	18.7	228	–	–
2020	not published	18,034	56,292	78,088	4,377	17.8	231	–	–
2019	not published	22,513	70,198	91,249	4,895	18.6	247	–	–
2018	not published	23,885	74,470	92,184	4,713	19.6	259	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Forship SpA	96.6	567	−83%	71 of 408	1,022	253	+304%	RINA	C
2024	Forship SpA	104	547	−81%	78 of 404	1,057	233	+354%	RINA	C
2023	not published	94.9	680	−86%	55 of 386	921	234	+294%	RINA	C
2022	not published	101	626	−84%	70 of 394	1,115	253	+341%	RINA	A
2021	not published	104	815	−87%	67 of 377	1,120	226	+395%	RINA	A
2020	not published	120	751	−84%	83 of 387	1,160	217	+433%	RINA	A
2019	not published	122	569	−79%	85 of 394	1,330	223	+497%	RINA	C
2018	not published	132	729	−82%	79 of 361	1,389	184	+655%	RINA	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.