Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

AUTOSTAR

IMO: 9206786
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,091 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 41.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: United European Car Carriers AS · part of UECC

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,546 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

113

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

140

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.0 (+138%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.2 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,834 t

CO₂ emitted

27,920 t

Distance sailed

78,248 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,808 h

284 days, 78% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.5 kg/nm · median 105 (−5%)

56.6Ranks 103 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 14.4 (−12%)

10.9Faster than 26% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 150 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+58%)

47.4Ranks 164 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,242 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AUTOSTAR
Ro-ro median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AUTOSTAR
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AUTOSTAR
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−6%	−7%	−3%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−2%	+5%	+17%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+7%	+5%	−20%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+0%	−3%	−8%	+32%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.0 kn	−4%	+26%	+29%	−19%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	−8%	−22%	−17%	+10%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	+12%	−6%	−3%	+16%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	United European Car Carriers AS	6,920	21,845	69,545	5,479	12.7	99.5	150	–
2024part-yearBio blend	UECC Grimsby Ltd	5,257	16,149	48,827	3,776	12.9	108	168	–
2024	United European Car Carriers AS	7,558	23,479	71,590	5,571	12.8	106	171	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6,597	13,263	61,292	5,115	12.0	108	–	–
2022	not published	7,676	24,609	76,696	6,220	12.3	100	164	–
2021	not published	8,346	26,758	83,623	6,564	12.7	99.8	124	–
2020	not published	6,726	21,565	64,822	6,676	9.7	104	154	–
2019	not published	8,834	27,920	78,248	6,808	11.5	113	140	–
2018	not published	8,116	25,671	80,548	5,888	13.7	101	121	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	United European Car Carriers AS	150	95.2	+58%	164 of 235	DNV	B
2024part-yearBio blend	UECC Grimsby Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	United European Car Carriers AS	171	97.5	+75%	164 of 220	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2022	not published	164	57.7	+185%	429 of 463	DNV	B
2021	not published	124	59.6	+108%	416 of 459	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	154	57.3	+169%	413 of 449	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	140	59.0	+138%	391 of 426	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	121	62.4	+94%	373 of 434	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.