Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

AMILCAR

IMO: 9207998
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,332 t
Flag (estimated): Tunisia
Port of registry: La Goulette
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.64 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COTUNAV

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,464 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

107

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (−0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

135

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (+25%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,584 t

CO₂ emitted

23,655 t

Distance sailed

70,933 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,620 h

193 days, 53% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 105 (+5%)

56.6Ranks 128 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 14.4 (+11%)

10.9Faster than 74% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 147 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+55%)

47.4Ranks 158 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU47%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

7,326 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

837 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AMILCAR
Ro-ro median

100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AMILCAR
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AMILCAR
Ro-ro median

80.0100120140160

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+2%	+6%	−4%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	−2%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+1%	−3%	−13%	+19%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+9%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+6%	+3%	−2%	−0%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−10%	−5%	+7%	−10%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+7%	+0%	−19%	+21%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COTUNAV	7,328	22,853	66,562	4,170	16.0	110	147	–
2024	COTUNAV	7,548	23,542	69,626	4,536	15.3	108	157	–
2023	not published	7,584	23,655	70,933	4,620	15.4	107	135	97%
2022	not published	8,643	26,949	81,707	5,084	16.1	106	114	97%
2021	not published	8,249	25,716	74,683	4,644	16.1	111	124	97%
2020	not published	7,965	24,832	76,269	4,613	16.5	104	124	–
2019	not published	8,284	25,828	71,570	4,548	15.7	116	139	97%
2018	not published	9,544	29,755	87,930	5,249	16.8	109	114	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COTUNAV	147	95.2	+55%	158 of 235	Verifavia	C
2024	COTUNAV	157	97.5	+61%	157 of 220	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	135	109	+25%	134 of 221	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	114	90.6	+25%	137 of 223	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	124	104	+20%	140 of 219	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	124	103	+21%	143 of 238	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	139	90.9	+53%	193 of 271	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	114	91.0	+26%	159 of 260	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.