Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

FINLANDIA

IMO: 9214379
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: EckerÖ
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Rederi Ab Eckero

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

229

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

250

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−69%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

466

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+106%)

Average speed

18.5 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

101.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,369 t

CO₂ emitted

64,274 t

Distance sailed

88,916 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,799 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 180 kg/nm · median 150 (+20%)

69.3Ranks 293 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 18.0 kn · median 15.8 (+14%)

12.0Faster than 70% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 140 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−75%)

66.8Ranks 100 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 313 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+24%)

48.6Ranks 222 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,390 t

6.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FINLANDIA
Ro-pax median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FINLANDIA
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

FINLANDIA
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

FINLANDIA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+8%	−46%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−10%	−8%	−7%	+21%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−4%	−5%	−0%	+19%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−6%	−9%	+3%	−27%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+2%	+5%	−2%	+2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−4%	−5%	+2%	+47%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+2%	−2%	−4%	+2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Rederi Ab Eckero	16,640	53,328	92,527	5,146	18.0	180	–	–
2024	Rederi Ab Eckero	16,017	51,351	85,673	4,766	18.0	187	–	–
2023	not published	19,006	60,919	91,736	5,186	17.7	207	–	–
2022	not published	19,741	62,205	91,811	5,087	18.0	215	–	–
2021	not published	20,369	64,274	88,916	4,799	18.5	229	–	–
2020	not published	20,375	64,202	90,799	5,060	17.9	224	–	–
2019	not published	20,700	65,224	88,966	4,879	18.2	233	–	–
2018	not published	21,188	66,929	92,968	4,882	19.0	228	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Rederi Ab Eckero	140	567	−75%	100 of 408	313	253	+24%	Verifavia	C
2024	Rederi Ab Eckero	262	547	−52%	133 of 404	298	233	+28%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	217	680	−68%	99 of 386	34.6	234	−85%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	182	626	−71%	97 of 394	387	253	+53%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	250	815	−69%	108 of 377	466	226	+106%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	244	751	−67%	106 of 387	489	217	+125%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	166	569	−71%	101 of 394	318	223	+43%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	163	729	−78%	87 of 361	452	184	+146%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.