Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK NEWCASTLE

IMO: 9215878
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,783 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,552 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

132

Container median 182 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

39.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+93%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

52.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,834 t

CO₂ emitted

40,063 t

Distance sailed

97,356 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,893 h

246 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 113 kg/nm · median 177 (−36%)

78.8Ranks 643 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 13.3 (−40%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+70%)

7.22Ranks 1,630 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU38%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

12,834 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

697 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK NEWCASTLE
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK NEWCASTLE
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK NEWCASTLE
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−6.2 kn	−10%	−50%	−17%	+23%	6.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−8%	−2%	+563%	−36%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2023	−2.6 kn	+10%	−8%	+33%	−14%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−7%	−3%	−95%	+52%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+1%	−6%	+2%	−31%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	4,248	13,385	37,760	4,727	8.0	113	27.7	90%
2024	Maersk A/S	5,708	17,895	45,477	3,192	14.2	126	22.5	98%
2023	not published	938	2,940	6,857	516	13.3	137	34.9	98%
2020	not published	641	1,995	5,143	323	15.9	125	40.7	100%
2019	not published	13,207	41,164	98,926	6,430	15.4	134	26.9	100%
2018	not published	12,834	40,063	97,356	5,893	16.5	132	39.0	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	27.7	16.3	+70%	1,630 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	22.5	17.5	+28%	1,242 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	34.9	19.4	+80%	1,451 of 1,899	ABS	C
2020	not published	40.7	17.6	+131%	1,483 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	26.9	18.9	+42%	1,169 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	39.0	20.2	+93%	1,326 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.