Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BUENAVISTA EXPRESS

IMO
9216585
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EEXI 28.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
FORTUNY, CIUDAD AUTONOMA MELILLA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
210
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+33%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
2.26
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−100%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
1.63
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−99%)
Average speed
17.6 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+9%)
Fuel per day at sea
88.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
17,710 t
CO₂ emitted
55,254 t
Distance sailed
84,265 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,797 h
200 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 209 kg/nm · median 150 (+39%)
69.3Ranks 345 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 15.8 (+0%)
12.0Faster than 50% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 463 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−18%)
66.8Ranks 183 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 819 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+224%)
48.6Ranks 324 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports94%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,321 t
6.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BUENAVISTA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • BUENAVISTA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BUENAVISTA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • BUENAVISTA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.6 kn+18%+22%−21%+352%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−1.6 kn−8%−16%−14%−37%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.4 kn+0%+2%+7%+57%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022−0.2 kn+1%+1%+8%−92%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021+0.2 kn−3%−2%+19%−90%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.7 kn−3%−7%−30%+78%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.5 kn−5%−7%−6%+341,557%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Fred. Olsen, S.A.10,78833,62651,6693,27415.8209––
2024COMPANIA TRASMEDITERRANEA, SA11,61636,23965,5454,30415.2177––
2023not published14,61745,61775,9374,52616.8193––
2022not published13,65442,62571,2544,33216.4192––
2021not published12,44938,88665,9203,97616.6189––
2020not published10,82833,81755,4753,37316.4195––
2019not published15,83449,41778,9684,61517.1201––
2018not published17,71055,25484,2654,79717.6210––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Fred. Olsen, S.A.463567−18%183 of 408819253+224%DNVA
2024COMPANIA TRASMEDITERRANEA, SA102547−81%77 of 404666233+186%Lloyd's RegisterB
2023not published163680−76%84 of 386701234+200%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2022not published104626−83%73 of 394736253+191%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2021not published1,356815+66%289 of 377862226+281%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2020not published13,764751+1,733%383 of 387870217+300%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2019not published7,721569+1,257%389 of 394269223+21%Lloyd's Register–
2018not published2.26729−100%16 of 3611.63184−99%Lloyd's Register–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.