Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Fred. Olsenyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Fred. Olsen | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 14 |
| CO₂ emitted | 498 kt+9.6% |
| Fuel per mile | 167 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 19.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Ro-pax |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 567
- Fred. Olsen1,195 (+111% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 253
- Fred. Olsen740 (+192% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred. Olsen | 8 | 1,195 740 freight | +111% +192% freight | 167 | 24.5 | 2,939 | 2.8% | – |
| Segment median | 567 253 freight | 0% |
Cruise
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 521
- Fred. Olsen588 (+13% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred. Olsen | 3 | 588 | +13% | 205 | 14.2 | 4,726 | 10.9% | – |
| Segment median | 521 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- Fred. Olsen541 (+468% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred. Olsen | 3 | 541 | +468% | 118 | 14.6 | 3,793 | 8.9% | – |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred. Olsen | DNV (14) | 79% | 14% | 21% | 0% |
Fred. Olsen: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BETANCURIA EXPRESS | 9557848 | Ro-pax | 1,686 g CO₂/pax·nm 471 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +198% +86% | 26.4 | 39,910 t | €0 |
| BENTAGO EXPRESS | 9213337 | Ro-pax | 1,490 g CO₂/pax·nm 890 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +163% +252% | 28.3 | 29,891 t | €0 |
| BENCOMO EXPRESS | 9206712 | Ro-pax | 1,312 g CO₂/pax·nm 560 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +132% +121% | 24.7 | 31,476 t | €0 |
| BARLOVENTO EXPRESS | 9237644 | Ro-pax | 1,239 g CO₂/pax·nm 392 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +119% +55% | 25.0 | 30,062 t | €0 |
| BAJAMAR EXPRESS | 9874296 | Ro-pax | 1,150 g CO₂/pax·nm 887 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +103% +250% | 25.7 | 49,005 t | €0 |
| BANADEROS EXPRESS | 9874301 | Ro-pax | 1,126 g CO₂/pax·nm 864 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +99% +241% | 25.6 | 47,685 t | €0 |
| BAHIA CARGO | 9207895 | Ro-ro | 568 g CO₂/t·nm | 297 | +91% | 14.0 | 21,206 t | €0 |
| BENTAYGA CARGO | 9207883 | Ro-ro | 541 g CO₂/t·nm | 297 | +83% | 14.7 | 19,112 t | €0 |
| BENCHIJIGUA EXPRESS | 9299056 | Ro-pax | 1,030 g CO₂/pax·nm 660 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +82% +161% | 25.9 | 45,451 t | €0 |
| BRENAS CARGO | 9160774 | Ro-ro | 236 g CO₂/t·nm | 161 | +47% | 15.2 | 21,063 t | €0 |
| BOREALIS | 9122552 | Cruise | 696 g CO₂/pax·nm | 521 | +34% | 14.6 | 53,555 t | €1.7m |
| BALMORAL | 8506294 | Cruise | 588 g CO₂/pax·nm | 521 | +13% | 13.4 | 39,118 t | €1.4m |
| BOLETTE | 9188037 | Cruise | 581 g CO₂/pax·nm | 521 | +12% | 14.7 | 36,960 t | €1.1m |
| BUENAVISTA EXPRESS | 9216585 | Ro-pax | 463 g CO₂/pax·nm 819 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | −18% +224% | 15.8 | 33,626 t | €0 |
30 of 14 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.