Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

TINKER BELL

IMO: 9217242
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Trelleborg
Ice class: IB
Former names: PETER PAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TT-Line GmbH & Co KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

207.6 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,328

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+134%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

76.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−70%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,002 t

CO₂ emitted

56,103 t

56,987 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

86,701 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,178 h

257 days, 71% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 207.6 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+38%)

69.3Ranks 343 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 15.8 (−11%)

12.0Faster than 30% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,327.97 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+134%)

66.76Ranks 347 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 76.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−70%)

48.59Ranks 69 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (56,103 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.9 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	+5%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	+2%	+15%	+6%	+1%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+6%	+0%	−10%	−2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−9%	−23%	−7%	−15%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−3%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−15%	−13%	+9%	−10%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	+59%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	18,002	56,103	86,701	6,178	14.0	207.6	–	–
2024	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	16,990	52,967	82,364	5,846	14.1	206.3	–	–
2023	not published	15,764	49,138	77,609	6,268	12.4	203.1	–	–
2022	not published	16,511	51,473	85,966	6,595	13.0	192.1	–	–
2021	not published	19,521	60,898	92,108	6,027	15.3	211.9	–	–
2020	not published	19,287	60,196	94,666	6,161	15.4	203.7	–	–
2019	not published	20,748	65,154	87,024	5,774	15.1	238.4	–	–
2018	not published	12,716	39,721	54,839	3,732	14.7	231.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	1,327.97	566.51	+134%	347 of 408	76.44	253.18	−70%	Verifavia	A
2024	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	1,347.22	546.68	+146%	334 of 404	72.90	232.85	−69%	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	1,330.04	680.04	+96%	326 of 386	76.56	233.94	−67%	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	1,353.89	626.32	+116%	341 of 394	91.03	252.90	−64%	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	1,600.04	815.19	+96%	318 of 377	91.97	226.00	−59%	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	1,756.07	750.91	+134%	314 of 387	93.75	217.49	−57%	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	1,945.30	569.03	+242%	365 of 394	85.37	222.56	−62%	DNV	A
2018	not published	1,946.55	728.92	+167%	300 of 361	94.12	184.05	−49%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.