Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

TINKER BELL

IMO: 9217242
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Trelleborg
Ice class: IB
Former names: PETER PAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TT-Line GmbH & Co KG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

203

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,330

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+96%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

76.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−67%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,764 t

CO₂ emitted

49,138 t

Distance sailed

77,609 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,268 h

261 days, 72% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 208 kg/nm · median 150 (+38%)

69.3Ranks 343 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 15.8 (−11%)

12.0Faster than 30% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,328 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+134%)

66.8Ranks 347 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 76.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−70%)

48.6Ranks 69 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports90%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5,140 t

10.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

TINKER BELL
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	+5%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	+2%	+15%	+6%	+1%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+6%	+0%	−10%	−2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−9%	−23%	−7%	−15%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−3%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−15%	−13%	+9%	−10%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	+59%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	18,002	56,103	86,701	6,178	14.0	208	–	–
2024	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	16,990	52,967	82,364	5,846	14.1	206	–	–
2023	not published	15,764	49,138	77,609	6,268	12.4	203	–	–
2022	not published	16,511	51,473	85,966	6,595	13.0	192	–	–
2021	not published	19,521	60,898	92,108	6,027	15.3	212	–	–
2020	not published	19,287	60,196	94,666	6,161	15.4	204	–	–
2019	not published	20,748	65,154	87,024	5,774	15.1	238	–	–
2018	not published	12,716	39,721	54,839	3,732	14.7	232	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	1,328	567	+134%	347 of 408	76.4	253	−70%	Verifavia	A
2024	TT-Line GmbH & Co KG	1,347	547	+146%	334 of 404	72.9	233	−69%	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	1,330	680	+96%	326 of 386	76.6	234	−67%	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	1,354	626	+116%	341 of 394	91.0	253	−64%	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	1,600	815	+96%	318 of 377	92.0	226	−59%	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	1,756	751	+134%	314 of 387	93.8	217	−57%	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	1,945	569	+242%	365 of 394	85.4	223	−62%	DNV	A
2018	not published	1,947	729	+167%	300 of 361	94.1	184	−49%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.