Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VOLCAN DE TENO

IMO
9221346
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EIV 67.69 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
131
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−16%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,615
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+184%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
1,615
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+626%)
Average speed
19.0 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+20%)
Fuel per day at sea
60.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,385 t
CO₂ emitted
26,883 t
Distance sailed
63,876 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,355 h
140 days, 38% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 145 kg/nm · median 150 (−3%)
69.3Ranks 181 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 23.0 kn · median 15.8 (+46%)
12.0Faster than 91% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 983 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+74%)
66.8Ranks 299 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 4,478 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+1,669%)
48.6Ranks 400 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports94%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,591 t
5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • VOLCAN DE TENO
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • VOLCAN DE TENO
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TENO
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TENO
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+4.4 kn+2%+26%+8%−41%4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−3.8 kn−1%−18%−11%−0%3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.2 kn−7%−6%+75%−11%Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+5.0 kn−8%+18%+524%−6%5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn+22%+16%−53%−3%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.9 kn+4%−1%−83%+29%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−8.1 kn−2%−31%+9%−66%8.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.7,83325,11253,9922,35223.0145––
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.7,12422,84050,1542,70118.6142––
2023not published8,07825,89956,3292,51822.4143––
2022not published4,94315,84732,1711,44822.2154––
2021not published8632,7685,15329917.2168––
2020not published1,5074,83311,00460818.1137––
2019not published8,38526,88363,8763,35519.0131––
2018not published7,85125,16958,6112,16627.1134––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.983567+74%299 of 4084,478253+1,669%Bureau VeritasB
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.1,676547+207%357 of 4041,111233+377%Bureau VeritasB
2023not published1,679680+147%347 of 386865234+270%Bureau VeritasA+B
2022not published1,896626+203%365 of 394997253+294%Bureau VeritasA+B
2021not published2,008815+146%328 of 377918226+306%Bureau VeritasA+B
2020not published2,079751+177%333 of 3871,665217+666%Bureau VeritasA+B
2019not published1,615569+184%346 of 3941,615223+626%Bureau VeritasA+B
2018not published4,687729+543%343 of 36111,263184+6,020%Bureau VeritasA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.