Navalyze · Container · Ship

NINGBO EXPRESS

IMO: 9229843
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 42,064 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,064 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

214.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.85

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−3%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,560 t

CO₂ emitted

45,213 t

45,928 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

67,815 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,818 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 214.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+21%)

78.8Ranks 1,371 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−3%)

7.22Ranks 1,073 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU55%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (23,142 t).

Fuel burned laden

94%

6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NINGBO EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NINGBO EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NINGBO EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−17%	−28%	−36%	+43%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.5 kn	+16%	+36%	+246%	−3%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−20%	−21%	+22%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	+14%	+36%	−24%	+13%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−5%	−11%	+5%	−10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	−3%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−1%	+6%	−10%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	14,560	45,213	67,815	4,818	14.1	214.7	15.85	94%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	27,544	86,206	106,375	6,538	16.3	258.9	11.05	99%
2023	not published	6,883	21,670	30,753	2,223	13.8	223.8	11.36	93%
2022	not published	7,063	22,103	25,246	1,799	14.0	279.8	13.84	–
2021	not published	8,151	25,559	33,315	2,826	11.8	244.7	12.29	–
2020	not published	8,165	25,539	31,710	2,517	12.6	257.5	13.68	–
2019	not published	8,616	26,924	32,802	2,636	12.4	262.7	14.04	–
2018	not published	9,687	30,271	36,462	3,125	11.7	265.7	14.99	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	15.85	16.30	−3%	1,073 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	11.05	17.52	−37%	527 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	11.36	19.40	−41%	480 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.84	19.13	−28%	621 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	12.29	17.90	−31%	484 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	13.68	17.58	−22%	634 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	14.04	18.88	−26%	569 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	14.99	20.22	−26%	546 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.