Navalyze · Container · Ship

NINGBO EXPRESS

IMO: 9229843
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 42,064 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 58,875 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

258

Container median 172 kg/nm (+50%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−22%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,165 t

CO₂ emitted

25,539 t

Distance sailed

31,710 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,517 h

105 days, 29% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 215 kg/nm · median 177 (+21%)

78.8Ranks 1,371 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−3%)

7.22Ranks 1,073 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports49%
From the EU17%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,451 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NINGBO EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NINGBO EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NINGBO EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−17%	−28%	−36%	+43%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.5 kn	+16%	+36%	+246%	−3%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−20%	−21%	+22%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	+14%	+36%	−24%	+13%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−5%	−11%	+5%	−10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	−3%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−1%	+6%	−10%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	14,560	45,213	67,815	4,818	14.1	215	15.9	94%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	27,544	86,206	106,375	6,538	16.3	259	11.1	99%
2023	not published	6,883	21,670	30,753	2,223	13.8	224	11.4	93%
2022	not published	7,063	22,103	25,246	1,799	14.0	280	13.8	–
2021	not published	8,151	25,559	33,315	2,826	11.8	245	12.3	–
2020	not published	8,165	25,539	31,710	2,517	12.6	258	13.7	–
2019	not published	8,616	26,924	32,802	2,636	12.4	263	14.0	–
2018	not published	9,687	30,271	36,462	3,125	11.7	266	15.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	15.9	16.3	−3%	1,073 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	11.1	17.5	−37%	527 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	11.4	19.4	−41%	480 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.8	19.1	−28%	621 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	12.3	17.9	−31%	484 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	13.7	17.6	−22%	634 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	14.0	18.9	−26%	569 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	15.0	20.2	−26%	546 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.