Navalyze · Container · Ship

KIEL EXPRESS

IMO: 9229855
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 44,659 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.11 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BERLIN EXPRESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,431 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

268

Container median 172 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−25%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

88.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,714 t

CO₂ emitted

27,233 t

Distance sailed

32,575 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,363 h

98 days, 27% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 211 kg/nm · median 177 (+19%)

78.8Ranks 1,345 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 50% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−10%)

7.22Ranks 985 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports47%
From the EU17%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,571 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KIEL EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KIEL EXPRESS
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KIEL EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.2 kn	−8%	−25%	−22%	+30%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.4 kn	−1%	+24%	+233%	−9%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−20%	−15%	−16%	−14%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+3%	+0%	−5%	+3%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+5%	−3%	+10%	+6%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−1%	+1%	+65%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	−7%	−17%	+48%	−18%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	15,444	48,063	73,163	5,484	13.3	211	14.7	96%
2024Bio blend	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	21,573	66,857	94,268	5,719	16.5	229	11.3	98%
2023	not published	6,572	20,635	28,305	2,155	13.1	232	12.4	92%
2022	not published	9,771	30,589	33,843	2,712	12.5	289	14.4	–
2021	not published	9,983	31,230	35,684	2,781	12.8	280	14.0	–
2020	not published	8,714	27,233	32,575	2,363	13.8	268	13.2	–
2019	not published	5,310	16,597	19,722	1,448	13.6	269	14.3	–
2018	not published	3,864	12,077	13,308	879	15.1	290	17.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	14.7	16.3	−10%	985 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024Bio blend	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	11.3	17.5	−35%	555 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	12.4	19.4	−36%	566 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	14.4	19.1	−25%	652 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	14.0	17.9	−22%	629 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	13.2	17.6	−25%	589 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	14.3	18.9	−24%	599 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	17.4	20.2	−14%	692 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.