Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SIRINA

IMO: 9230127
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,401 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,401 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

96.9 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

56.25

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+595%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

152 t

CO₂ emitted

476 t

484 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

1,568 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

117 h

5 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 96.9 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+15%)

61.8Ranks 2,252 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 10.6 (+26%)

8.8Faster than 99% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.25 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+595%)

4.85Ranks 3,070 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports37%
From the EU39%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU16%

77% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (366 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

16.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.017

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SIRINA
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SIRINA
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SIRINA
Bulk carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+12%	+21%	−91%	+404%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−20%	−18%	−4%	+31%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+19%	+16%	+271%	−22%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+62%	+74%	−64%	+115%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 62%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−42%	−38%	+38%	−57%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	−14%	+8%	+3%	−6%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	152	476	1,568	117	13.4	96.9	56.25	–
2023	not published	1,455	4,569	16,795	1,364	12.3	86.6	11.16	–
2022	not published	1,887	5,960	17,452	1,454	12.0	108.1	8.50	–
2021	not published	428	1,344	4,702	383	12.3	91.0	10.88	–
2020	not published	725	2,259	12,900	1,126	11.5	56.2	5.05	–
2019	not published	913	2,844	9,360	882	10.6	97.5	11.88	–
2018	not published	1,029	3,229	9,087	1,078	8.4	113.3	12.59	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	56.25	8.09	+595%	3,070 of 3,089	RINA	B
2023	not published	11.16	8.27	+35%	2,615 of 3,548	RINA	B
2022	not published	8.50	8.71	−2%	1,889 of 3,968	RINA	B
2021	not published	10.88	8.57	+27%	2,513 of 3,466	RINA	B
2020	not published	5.05	8.24	−39%	290 of 3,150	RINA	B
2019	not published	11.88	8.38	+42%	2,664 of 3,360	RINA	B
2018	not published	12.59	8.50	+48%	2,771 of 3,384	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.